Tennessee House Speaker Jimmy Naifeh announced his committee appointments on Thursday, yielding a similar “no surprise” composition as in the past. Of the 18-member committee:
- 6 represent Shelby Co./Memphis
- 11 represent the four Metro areas (Memphis, Nashville, Chattanooga, Knoxville)
- 11 represent only school systems that would gain under the TACIR funding prototype (67% of school systems lose funding under that plan)
Four others represent mixed districts, where some school systems would gain while others lose. John Mark Windle is one of those, where Fentress and Overton counties would gain funding, while Morgan County would lose. It’s tough to know how a legislator in that position would tend to vote — does it depend on how many votes are in the winning counties versus the losing, or the legislator’s own philosophy about education funding, or whether it’s a net gain overall? Or maybe something else?
The Committee Members are: (newly-elected reps in italics)
- Les Winningham (D-Huntsville), Chair
- Tommie Brown (D-Chattanooga), Vice Chair;
- Joe Towns (D-Memphis), Secretary;
- Barbara Cooper (D-Memphis);
- John Hood (D-Murfreesboro);
- Ulysses Jones (D-Memphis);
- Mark Maddox (D-Dresden);
- Mike McDonald (D-Portland);
- Larry Turner (D-Memphis);
- John Mark Windle (D-Livingston);
- Harry Brooks (R-Knoxville);
- Jim Coley (R-Bartlett);
- Dolores Gresham (R-Somerville);
- Beth Harwell (R-Nashville);
- Phillip Johnson (R-Pegram);
- Ron Lollar (R-Bartlett);
- Gerald McCormick (R-Chattanooga);
- Richard Montgomery (R-Seymour).
Any plan that takes from some districts to give to others is a bad plan. While it may be necessary to provide additional state funding to some areas based on the local tax base or special needs, Tennessee is not a state that over-funds any school system. If we are to improve, funding must improve overall.
This House committee doesn’t look like one that will do so, though I hope I am wrong.