Commission Dist. 7

There’s some interest in the District 7 Commission race, where John Shuey finished with one vote more than Joe Lee. Here’s how the numbers break down:

ABS EARLY AUG 3 TOTAL
HVW Creasey 2 112 133 247
Lee 3 72 80 155
Shuey 3 49 96 148
PVL Creasey 13 201 255 469
Lee 10 115 121 246
Shuey 11 110 125 246
WDL Creasey 19 80 126 225
Lee 16 48 58 122
Shuey 22 37 71 130
TOTAL ALL PRECINCTS
Creasey 34 393 514 941
Lee 29 235 259 523
Shuey 36 196 292 524

If I were Joe Lee (though I’ve never even met him), I think I’d ask for an inspection of the absentee ballots, at the very least. I’d also check to see of any of these were precincts where paper ballots were used, or where excessive lines caused people to leave without voting.

Precinct Returns

For those who are interested (AT, AT2, and anyone else), I’ve finished keying in all the countywide general election returns — or at least the contested races. Click here for the PDF.

Turnout was a factor; I have to wonder how many people left without voting when they encountered lines of an hour, two, or more on election day (in very hot and humid conditions). 15,232 people voted this year, compared with 18,194 in August 2002. Could 3,000 people have made a difference?

You betcha. Stay tuned.

Flanking on the Right

I perused a copy of Metro Pulse while waiting on Alpha and Gamma to seemingly try on every pair of jeans in a store yesterday, and was intrigued by an article that seemed to have been written just for me.

Time ran out before I could finish reading, so I pulled it up online this morning. It feels like it was written just for me. So, if you’ve experienced some discomfort about political parties lately, go read Flanking on the Right.

You remember him, I bet. It seems like he was here just the other day. He usually wore a blue suit and a sensible tie. His main concerns were lower taxes, less government, but still he knew some public works were important and somebody had to pay for them. The Tennessee Republican’s politics were moderate, often progressive, and above all, sensible. To get what he wanted, or a good part of it, he could make you a deal. He knew that making deals was the heart of a successful business, and of successful government. The main thing that separated him from the wild-eyed liberal Democrat was that he was a pragmatic fellow. He liked to keep his politics, like the art on his walls, realistic.

Except for use of the masculine prounoun, this fits me. I came to align myself with the Republican party on the principles articulated in the Republican Philosophy — things like “the government closest to the people is the best,” or “government should do only those things that people cannot do, or cannot do well, for themselves.” It is my belief in a strong national defense, a free-market economy, and limited government interference that has traditionally led me to identify with the Republican party.

If you haven’t done so yet, read the article. Yes, I know what the right-wing bloggers think of Metro Pulse, but if you are at all interested in polical philosophy, this one nails it. A couple more noteworthy clips are:

“I see it as a problem for the country in that the candidates tend to focus on issues that may not have much to do with their constituents’ lives. Flag-burning, gay marriage—I may feel like they do about those issues,” he says, as the conservative he is. But he adds that those emotional flashpoint issues aren’t affecting people’s real lives—“They’re not eating up America like the war, the economy, and gas prices.” True enough, few East Tennesseans have ever witnessed either a flagburning or a gay marriage. [John Schmid]

and

A young Republican businessman attending the Republican rally admits he has nothing against abortion. “I’m not interested in legislating morality,” he says. “To me, it’s a moral issue, not a government issue.” Of the pro-life faction in his party, he says, “It’s a small group, but it’s the loudest. It’s like everybody thinks all Islamic people are terrorists. It’s only a small percentage. But they’re the loudest.”

But there is hope. The closing paragraph comes from Howard Baker, whom many of us would uphold as the Dean of Tennessee Republicans:

Howard Baker, now 80 years old, is still a senior partner in the law firm of Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell and Berkowitz, which has offices in downtown Knoxville and the former senator’s home town of Huntsville. He is recovering from back surgery and was not available to comment for this article. But at a Memphis Downtown Rotary Club meeting last October, responding to a question about the right-wing tendencies of his party, he answered that he expected the GOP “will right itself” from its ultra-conservative leanings. Concerning the party’s current tilt, he added, “That’s not permanent. The party system’s going to survive it…. Cyclical changes will prevent any permanent pattern of extremism. Change may seem far off, but it’s just around the corner.”

We’ll see. I surely hope he’s right.

Election Review

The pro-Beauchamp v. anti-Beauchamp matchup ended 2:2. He got the Gen. Sessions Judge and Sheriff; he lost the DA and Chancellor.

Of course, he’s had a sheriff tell him to take a hike before, and could again. We’ll see what Paul White is made of.

Like AtomicTumor, it’s the General Sessions Judge race that was the most painful for me. It was so close, with Stuart leading in early voting, that I’m most anxious to see the precinct-by-precinct returns. Unfortunately, due to all the yes-no judicial races and such, the document is two hundred and a bunch pages, so the election commission will be charging for copies this year.

Truthfully, I don’t want a paper copy. I’d rather have it electronically, but with the new system, they don’t yet know how to do that. The Clinton Courier has already picked up the detailed returns, so it will be in their Sunday edition; the Oak Ridger usually carries it, but they hadn’t yet picked one up at 9:30 or so… and 10:00 is generally their deadline, so I’m not sure they’re going to carry it today. Maybe they kept track last night, but unfortunately, WYSH and Channel 12 weren’t reporting the results by individual precinct.

Just out of curiosity, I wonder how many people voted in this election who are currently under supervision of the probation department? That’s not illegal (unless they’re convicted felons), but it would raise eyebrows if there were any evidence of “persuasion” by probation officials.

I’m immensely glad that we have a new DA, and I have a great deal of confidence in Dave Clark. He simply will not ignore investigations that ought to go to the Grand Jury, and the process can work the way it is supposed to. And, contrary to some recent predictions, that one wasn’t even close. Of course, three-way races are notoriously tricky to predict. It was a three-way general that kept Ramsey in office sixteen years ago, with the narrowest of margins between all three.

Robin Biloski will do a fine job as the new 8th District Commissioner, along with veteran Iwanski. That really was a race with three good people, but I know that Robin will represent Oak Ridge well.

Lastly, in the 7th District, Joe Lee fell just one vote short, giving John Shuey the nod. However, that happened in 2002 with Jerry Creasey losing to Chuck Fritts by one, and irregularities led to the election being voided. Creasey won in a November rematch. I expect there will be a thorough review of why paper ballots were used on election day in this district, with a strong possibility of a challenge by Lee if anything looks amiss.

Voting in Memphis (again and again and again)

Sheesh… is it even possible to have an honest election in Memphis, or should we just sell it off to Arkansas?

WATE reports that

The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation is investigating a report of a man who posed as a Shelby County precinct official to pick up ballots and voting materials before Thursday’s primary.

On the day before elections, officials from the county’s 279 precincts are expected to report to the county’s election operations center to pick up metal ballot boxes, ballot applications, signs and voter lists.

Election Commissioner O.C. Pleasant, Jr. told The Commercial Appeal a man showed up Wednesday and said he represented Precinct 491 and left with the election materials. The error was discovered when the real official arrived later at the center.

I don’t know exactly where precinct 491 is, but I’d wager a cold one it’s in the district where Ophelia Ford was removed from a State Senate seat because the number of dead people, felons, and non-residents was deemed to exceed her margin of alleged victory.

For all the upheaval that our local elections have wrought, at least I do have significant confidence in the security of our ballots in Anderson County. It wasn’t always so, but the Election Commission is a tightly run ship these days. For this, I am grateful.

If you haven’t voted…

Vote tomorrow: Thursday, August 3.

It’s more important than eating lunch; it’s more important than getting to the grocery store, picking up dry cleaning, or whatever you normally do right after work.

Choices made tomorrow will affect this county for eight long years… there’s no way you could have missed exposure to at least most of the candidates.

My picks:

Chancellor: Bill Lantrip. The Chancellor has a tough job, because he decides things like divorces, custody, matters of equity, and other emotionally-charged cases. He is patient and kind, and applies the law fairly as written to all who come before him. While it is inevitable that one party will leave unhappy from any case in his court, he is careful to cause no more harm to people already in an emotionally trying circumstance in applying the law gently and justly.

General Sessions Div. I: David Stuart. David is extraordinarily competent in his knowledge of the law, posesses the ability to remain calm under pressure, and is a gentleman of the utmost honesty and integrity. In the last couple of months, he has brought to light some discomforting truths about the incumbent judge — truths that call into question the reliability of our local judicial system and other aspects of county government. While unpleasant to confront, his honesty and candor have provided a crucial service to the people of this county. Thank him, but more importantly, vote for him.

District Attorney: David Clark. David Clark has proven himself in his service as County Attorney, and in spite of the fact that I did not like nor agree with all of the causes he took up in that position (namely annexation issues), I do understand that was the nature of the job and that he performed it well. As District Attorney, he would apply the same work eithic to a different job: prosecuting those accused of breaking the law, without exception. He won’t back down for fear of the risk of a jury trial, nor for political pressure. He’s the best choice for DA.

Sheriff: Bill White. The bottom line is, Bill White has gotten the job done. He’s gotten the job done even within cities with their own police departments, when those departments failed for whatever reason. And even though Alan Beauchamp managed his campaign in 2002, Bill White knew when to tell him to “take a hike.”

Juvenile Court Judge: April Meldrum. This was a tough call for me, because just last year, Pat Hess handled the juvenile burglar who broke into my home and stole my car exactly as I would have wanted: tough enough to get his attention, but without wrecking his life or jeopardizing his future. At the request of a friend, I met with April earlier this year, and was very impressed with her. Her priorities are the right ones — the best interest of children, including those who have gone astray. She’s not a marshmellow, but she will dispose of cases on a timely basis… and when dealing with permanency issues for children, timely is essential. April has my vote.

Trustee: John Stair. John has the accounting experience to do the job well, all other factors aside. That his mother has done the job impeccably for thirty years is some assurance that there would be a smooth transition, and that he won’t fire all the experienced staff. Patsy put customer service foremost, and John will continue that tradition.

I don’t have any contested races for County Commission, but I’ll cast a vote for Scott Gillenwaters anyway, because he’s done a good job, and always takes my calls. If you’re in District 8, I’d recommend Robin Biloski and Myron Iwanski (everybody needs a good pair of skis); if you’re in District 2, David L. Bolling is a keeper.

Hmmm… hardly as entertaining as AtomicTumor’s endorsements, but food for thought in any case.

Get the Facts

This afternoon’s front-page story sheds a bit more light on the infamous TBI investigation of Alan Beauchamp and his repeated threats of a libel suit.

[Oak Ridger, 8/1/06] In 2004, area media reported that the probation director had been cleared.

But TBI spokeswoman Jennifer Johnson sees the outcome differently.

“The TBI doesn’t, quote, clear people,” she said. Anderson County District Attorney General Jim Ramsey agreed.

“We’re not in the business of clearing people,” he said.

I’ve been told that the statute of limitations for possible charges in relation to this investigation has not expired, although I confess that I don’t know enough about criminal law to know exactly what those charges might be, nor how long the statute of limitations is. But if that is true, it does shed some light on why he might be so motivated to help his allies win the District Attorney’s race and a couple of judgeships.

Now, if only the article had noted that the documents posted on LetsTalkFrank.com did not come from the TBI file, but from Anderson County records, I would feel fully vindicated.

It is unfortunate that the local papers are compelled to note in every article my status as a school board member, because the creation of that website had nothing whatsoever to do with the school board. It was the act of a private citizen on a Saturday morning. Of course, I do understand that it is news only because I hold elective office.

If I were just another mom sitting at the keyboard, it’s unlikely that the papers would have covered it at all, and that would have been too bad.

Hits to the site skyrocketed after last week’s story. It’s now up to 5,213.

Change all around

When you see something every day, it’s all too easy to miss subtle changes.

I just returned after a couple weeks’ absence, and noticed several substantial differences just in the short time I was away. On the turnpike, an old bank building at Jefferson Avenue — it was Heritage Federal a decade or more ago — has now been cleaned up and transformed into a new bank.

It looks a lot better.

Further east, the new apartments along Emory Valley Road near SAIC have absolutely sprung out of the ground, seemingly on their own, since I left. This is also great news for Oak Ridge, since we don’t have much in the way of upscale starter residences for young professionals, or a place for people to live while they build.

These new projects are definitely an encouraging sign. I’m also looking forward to visiting the new Sonic on Illinois, since it means I don’t have to drive to the other side of town to get a positively decadent chocolate malt — an infrequent indulgence, but a treasured one nonetheless.

Resources

AtomicTumor commented on the previous post that he fears a chilling in the web community… fear not. There are some wonderful resources out there:

Keep on Blogging!

Also, see “Libel in the Blogosphere: Some Preliminary Thoughts” by Glenn Reynolds, UT Law Professor and blogger extraordinaire (Instapundit).

And here is where I contemplate these weighty issues. You can tell it’s really troubling me, can’t you?

Fear Factor?

Is a $1.75 million lawsuit scarier than one for $25,000? Only if you lose.

Libel is the publication of false and defamatory statements, presented as fact. Where public figures are concerned, there must also be proven “actual malice.”

In other words, you have to publish statements presented as fact that you know to be false, with the intent of doing harm to the person in question. It doesn’t include statements of opinion, just statements presented as fact.

The LetsTalkFrank.com website that generated the threat of a $1.75 million libel suit simply contains public records on file in Anderson County, primarily from the Sheriff’s Department. No claim was made as to the veracity of the statements in the public record, but in my opinion, the women who made those statements had little to gain – and much to lose – by going up against the Probation Director who was in a position to make their lives much more difficult.

Also a matter of public record is the arrest of Beauchamp’s attorney, Michael Wayne Ritter, for DUI on May 9, as published in the Oak Ridger. And his censure by the Tennessee Board of Professional Responsibility in August, 2004. [Hat tip to anotherthing2]

Personally, I wholeheartedly agree with David Stuart that the TBI file should be made public now. The central figure in this investigation is heavily involved in campaigns of several people up for election next Thursday, and the outcome of this election will undoubtedly influence the power wielded by someone with serious ethical allegations outstanding.

LetsTalkFrank.com is up to 4,872 visits and counting — a number bolstered by 350 or so just since the appearance of the most recent Oak Ridger story. All those press releases about lawsuits are driving traffic so fast that it soon won’t matter whether they succeed in getting the site host to take it down… every voter in the county will have already seen it.