Wanna join the Mafia?

In this morning’s News Sentinel, Sen. Randy McNally likens his replacement as caucus chair to the replacement of Tom Hagen as the Corleone family’s consigliere. “We need a wartime consigliere,” he said.

Terry Frank‘s closing comments on the matter exemplify precisely what’s wrong in politics today:

He refused to endorse several GOP house candidates here in his own district over the years, including the most recent GOP candidate, David Massengill.

If McNally says this was truly a smack-down like he seems to intimating, then here’s a real lesson from the Godfather. If you turn on the family, expect to being taken for a little car ride.

I fully understand the utility of political parties, but I draw the line at mafia-like tactics to force representatives of the people to toe the party line. We elect individuals based upon their individual qualities; I vote for individuals based upon their integrity, understanding of issues, willingness to listen, and ability to work with others. I’ve voted for Randy McNally every time he’s been on the ballot, and will continue to do so.

Massengill is a caricature, and one who would have done precisely as Terry Frank and the other neo-cons dictated without ever thinking about the people of his district. He looked me in the eye over coffee one afternoon and told me that “we’ve got to focus on social issues like abortion and gay marriage to grow the party,” which is precisely the opposite of my priorities in government.

Government should do only what people cannot do, or do well, for themselves.

The mafia operating mode is how Terry Frank destroyed the Anderson County Republican Party — no room for views other than her own, no room for candidates except those equipped with the strings of a marionette.

Thanks, but no thanks.

Do we want to be at war?

Forget the Middle East for a moment, and think about Tennessee.  Do we want to be obstructionist, or do we want to work together to accomplish something positive?

I’ll choose the latter — there’s enough war going on elsewhere.

When the State Senate Republicans met yesterday, Ron Ramsey was elected Majority Leader (sans the vote of Mike Williams, who abstained) and Mark Norris was elected to the post of caucus chair over Randy McNally, chosen last year following the resignation of Jeff Miller.

Williams’ abstention comes as no surprise, given the harsh words that have been exchanged thus far.  It seems that Ramsey would rule by intimidation and punishment, rather than respect and persuasion.  Williams’ response (via the Chattanooga Times) is what I expected:

Sen. Williams appeared upset when asked by reporters about Sen. Ramsey’s assertions in a personal letter to him that minority Democrats are trying to play him for a “patsy” as they seek to hold onto power despite the GOP’s majority.

“I think in my 16 years of service here, I think a lot of things could be said about me. I don’t think (any) person could ever say that I’m a patsy,” Sen. Williams said, citing his fight to oppose then-Republican Gov. Don Sundquist’s proposed state income tax.

“I fought that in the best interests of the citizens of this state. … I spoke out on the Legislative Plaza when certain senators around were nowhere to be found. I think my record speaks that I’m anything but a patsy,” Sen. Williams said.

I don’t disagree with Ramsey that we should have a Republican speaker, now going into the second consecutive Republican majority in that body… I’m just not certain he’s the right one.

With McNally free of other caucus responsibilities, he would be the superior choice.  McNally is unwavering in his principles, yet able to work with others to be productive and accomplish something for Tennessee.

I don’t want a do-nothing, obstructionist Senate.  I’m tired of the name-calling, petty partisan games. It’s time to elect a Speaker who might actually accomplish something productive, and the man for the job is Randy McNally.

Words as paint

Even as a young child, I wondered if words created the same images for all people, and if those images were based on anything real, or just randomly associated.
Watching Harry Potter movies the other night (we’ve read all the books until the spines are worn and limp), I noted to Delta that some of J.K. Rowling’s made-up words actually look sort of like other words — words that create a specific picture. Diagon Alley, the mythical shopping place for wizardly books and school supplies, brings to mind something not quite on the straight and narrow — diagonally, to be precise. Even the characters’ names seem to fit, with Snape sounding like “snake” (fitting, for the headmaster of Slytherin) and the evil Malfoy family: Draco, looking and sounding like a little blond dracula; Lucius, with a name reminiscent of Lucifer; even the last name itself, beginning with “mal,” a prefix meaning bad.

Reading about reactions to the Iraq Study Group report prompted a slideshow of mental images as well… somehow, someone with the last name Talabani doesn’t elicit any feelings of trust. Neither does Al-Maliki (which sounds like Malachai, the name of the most evil character in Children of the Corn).
In Freakonomics, Steven Levitt explores the relationship between children’s names and their professional prospects. The reasoning is likely along the same lines: we associate images — good or bad — with the printed and spoken word.

16 Days Out

Sixteen days until Christmas, and I’m… not ready. But I am getting into the holiday spirit, at least a little.

Hubby has never been slave to watch, clock, or calendar, so some things just happen when they happen. Like birthday presents (purchased well ahead of time, I would note, but left hidden for a couple of extra days for good measure).

But today, the present finally appeared — following some prompting from the children, who wanted cookies, but were put off because my old hand mixer makes noises like it’s about to explode and send shrapnel all over the kitchen. The birthday replacement is a KitchenAid Classic stand mixer, which has already helped to produce a loaf of gingerbread, peanut butter cookies, and my personal favorite, soft gingerbread cookies.

With extensive help from Gamma (the only person in the house with any talent for decorating), I also got the Christmas tree up. No ornaments yet, but it’s up, it has lights and an angel, and there are a couple of pretty presents beneath.

Delta thinks the presents are fake, BTW. It’s the best bet for ensuring that there is no shaking or sneaky unwrapping.

How to… NOT

This morning’s Nashville City Paper features a story entitled “Ramsey to Williams: Don’t be a Patsy.”

The gist is that Ramsey wants Williams’ vote for Majority Leader.  Has to have it, as there aren’t any Democrats willing to jump ship for Ramsey.  On the other hand, Williams has voted in the past for Lt. Governor Wilder — a Democrat, but one who ran the Senate more fairly than any other.  Odd as Wilder may be, one does have to appreciate that he organized that body with committee control shared by members of both parties.

Sen. Ron Ramsey probably knows Sen. Mike Williams better than I do, having worked with him in the upper house of the State Legislature for several years now.  But I do know Mike well enough to know that saying stupid things — calling childish names, even — is absolutely not the right way to persuade him to your point of view.

I fully understand the Senate Republicans’ desire for a Republican speaker; I understand the desire of many (of both parties, or no particular party at all for that matter) to have a Lt. Governor in whom there is a higher level of confidence in his, shall we say, mental faculties.  That said, I also think that a better tactic for electing a Republican speaker might be to back one who is seen as less sharply partisan than Ramsey.  Not necessarily any different in their views on issues, but one whose tactics are more gentle.

Mike Williams is not a “liberal” Republican, but he’s definitely his own man, representing his own constituents.  Threatening him or calling him silly names is very likely to drive him straight to the decision that Ramsey doesn’t want.

An alternate choice would be nice.

The day that will live in infamy…

Pearl HarborAs the snow flurries fly, I’m thinking about Hawaii, and about the survivors who have gathered there, perhaps for the last time.

They’re old now, but 65 years ago today, most were the same age as my oldest child (now a freshman at UT). They’ve gathered today — as they do on this date every five years — not to enjoy the sun, the sand or bikinis, but to remember the most awful day they ever knew: a beautiful sunny morning in Hawaii, ripped apart in the early morning hours by the Japanese surprise attack.

A day when 2,390 of their mostly teenage and young-twenties colleagues died.

I remember still how my maternal grandfather reacted to this anniversary. Days shy of his 38th birthday at the time, with toddlers at home (his first three children were killed in an accident before the other six were born), he was far from Pearl Harbor. Nonetheless, he remembered the day with solemn reserve for the rest of his days.

As is my habit, I will watch the movie again. It’s my birthday treat (yes, ha ha, I was born on the day that will live in infamy), though likely rather late this evening after a Christmas party and the ORHS band concert.

While I watch, I’ll enjoy a special treat courtesy of Realtorchick… seems fitting for a woman of my vintage.

Sad News

Sadly, the CNET editor who’s been lost in the Oregon woods for more than a week has been found.  Dead.

The news Monday that his family was rescued from the car where they stayed was most hopeful, particularly with the qualification that James Kim was an experienced outdoorsman.  I had hoped against hope that he had found shelter through the nights and would be reunited with his wife and young daughters.

I’d never met him, but CNET is one of my primary sources for technology news and reviews… I know that the whole organization mourns his loss.

Race and Education

A pair of cases before the US Supreme Court this week may yield a whole new interpretation of Brown v. Board of Education, as parents in two states have sued to put an end to racial preference in school assignments.

Coverage of the arguments and justices’ comments can be found in this morning’s Commercial Appeal, Tennessean, and the WSJ.

It seems that the real disparity is not a question of race, but of socioeconomics. The socioeconomic issue is masked to some degree by the fact that African-American and Hispanic students are overrepresented in the lower socioeconomic bracket, leading many to still consider race as the primary issue.

The Tennessean says;

Since the end of desegregation, the [Metro Nashville] district is home not only to more single-race schools, but also to more schools with a high poverty rate. And with a high poverty rate comes inequality, Smrekar said.

Race, class linked

Schools with high poverty rates also tend to have a disproportionate number of teachers teaching outside their field, according to Smrekar’s research. There’s also a higher percentage of inexperienced teachers and a higher rate of teacher turnover.

Typically, more experienced teachers opt for schools with more affluent student populations, experts said.

Students in the lower socioeconomic group are termed “at-risk” in edu-speak. One answer to the problem of teacher quality in schools with high “at-risk” populations is to offer an economic incentive for the best teachers to teach there. I realize that there is tremendous resistance from the teachers’ unions (not just in Tennessee, but all over the US) to any form of differentiated compensation, but if we are to ask some to do a significantly more difficult task in a less enjoyable work environment, there has to be some reason for the best in the profession to choose those schools.

The most obvious incentive from the private sector would be compensation.

No, public schools don’t follow the “run it like a business” model very well, since businesses do have the choice of rejecting raw material that isn’t up to their quality standards. A business has the right to set the fee for its product or service based upon the cost to produce or provide it, where public schools do not. But in terms of personnel performance, there are lessons to be taken from the private sector.

It is my observation that the “socio” part of socioeconomic is probably the greater challenge. Certainly, students from low-income families may have fewer resources (encyclopedias, computers, even nutrition) at home, but much has been done to address that disparity through schools, public libraries, and public assistance. It’s the child whose parent(s) may be absent in the evenings, drunk or on drugs, or who just doesn’t care that faces the greater challenge.

And yes, a superior teacher can make a difference even in the child whose home life is abysmal.

We’re lucky in Oak Ridge… our elementary school with the greatest number of at-risk students is also the one with the lowest teacher turnover, and a staff that I would hold up against any other, in any school system. We’re also fortunate in that, as a relatively small city, our demographics are pretty evenly distributed — not perfectly, but much more so than in most places.

I would tend to agree that school assignment based on race should end. At the same time, I would argue that it’s in all of our best interests to find a way to address the “socio” disparity as quickly and effectively as possible… if we do not, it will not only be self-perpetuating, but will snowball out of control.

FIRST PLACE!

Siemens TeamThree ORHS students have taken the grand prize in the Siemens Math, Science and Technology competition in New York today.

Breaking news at the Oak Ridger says:

The three ORHS students are Scott Molony, Steven Arcangeli and Scott Horton.

In their winning team project, “Linking Supercomputing and Systems Biology for Efficient Bioethanol Production,” the students contribute to a growing body of research on creating microrganisms that can produce alternative fuels, according to a Siemens news release.

“This team used supercomputers to analyze biological networks, looking at tens of thousands of genes and their biological pathways to discover clues for engineering direct biofuel production by microorganisms,” said competition judge Gary Benson, an associate professor in the departments of computer science, biology and director of graduate studies program in bioinformatics at Boston University. “Through a real team effort and a sophisticated, interdisciplinary approach, they developed a promising method that takes us a step closer to engineering biofuel.”

Based partly on the team’s work, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory received a major grant to continue this research. The team’s mentors were Nagiza Samatova, Chris Symons, Byung-Hoony Park, and Tatiana Karpinets, all with ORNL.

There may be an appearance on Good Morning America tomorrow. Congratulations to Scott, Steven, and Scott, along with Benita Albert, who continues to hone some of the most brilliant young minds in America — if not the world.

Update: WATE has a better picture.