Imagine for a moment being in a town where people have never been exposed to dogs: they know what a dog looks like, because theyâ€™ve seen pictures of them, or maybe seen them from a distance when they travel to other placesâ€¦ but theyâ€™ve never actually petted a dog, or walked one on a leash, or even spent five minutes observing one.
Now, some kook in the town wants to make it legal to keep pet dogs in the dog-free town.Â â€œThey will poop in the yards!â€ people exclaim.Â â€œThey will bark and make awful noise, and they will chase our cats!â€Â â€œSome people might even let their dogs in the house â€“ just think of how unsanitary that would be, and how dangerous to the children!â€Â Â The townsfolk, having never been exposed to the companionship of dogs, are opposed.
Some bring up the scenario of dogfights, which attract gambling and other unsavory activities.
The dog-loving kook is fully supportive of a standard leash law, and that all dog owners should have to purchase a license from the city every year for every dog. Â He supports requiring immunizations against dangerous diseases (like rabies), and the ownerâ€™s maintaining proof of such.Â Many of the townsfolk mill about in opposition to the kookâ€™s crazy dog plan, but little by little, respectable ordinary people step forward, cautiously expressing a willingness to consider the idea.
â€œMy brother has a dog,â€ said one, â€œand he keeps burglars away from the house when my brother is gone.â€Â Another explains that sheâ€™d really like for her aged mother to have a dog for companionship.Â Someone else mentions theyâ€™ve heard that dogs can actually be trained to assist the blind.Â All of these people are in favor of reasonable limitations â€“ no one suggests just letting the dogs run wild, stealing suppers from the table, biting children, and pooping on the town hall steps.
Can this hypothetical town accept change?Â Is there any possibility that they can get past the fear of the unfamiliar, to find the benefits of a companion animal who helps guard their home, gives them a reason to go outdoors and walk, and offers unconditional love each day?
*Â *Â *
Now, turn your imagination 45 degrees, and see that the hypothetical town is our town.Â The discussion is not about dogs, but about chickens.Â The proposed regulations would be similar:Â roosters would not be allowed (thus eliminating the noise component), the number of birds would be limited, confinement to the back or side yard would be required.Â Registration and purchase of a license would also be required, just as it is for dogs.
The benefits are slightly different, but comparable.Â Â Can this town ever get past its paranoia to try something new?
Great metaphor! The closing sentence is a zinger…. 🙂
Dogs do not lay eggs. OK, just kidding with you.
Just another move toward we can’t accept change.
Is this thing on?
Just imagine if this blog were alive.